Supercommunicators! Why Listening Isnât Enough đĄ

Collaboration is the lifeblood of any organization, yet weâve all experienced moments when it just doesnât click. đ€ Teams talk past each other, great ideas get lost in the noise, and the results donât match the effort.
So, what goes wrong?
And more importantly, how can we fix it?
Recently, I had the opportunity to explore these challenges in a keynote for Eurowings âïž as part of Leadership Choicesâ ongoing collaboration with Lufthansa.
The session was designed to tackle cross-functional teamwork and create space for real conversations about what helpsâand hindersâeffective cross functional collaboration. While the morning started off with low energy (thanks to a rocking đ¶birthday celebration the night before! đ), we quickly found our rhythm through structured input, interventions and dynamic World CafĂ© discussions âđŹ
Three Surprising Collaboration Pitfalls đ§
My keynote + workshop sessions drew inspiration from Charles Duhiggâs Supercommunicators đ and Patrick Lencioniâs trust-based teamwork model đ€
Here are three unexpected barriers to collaboration that surfaced, along with strategies to overcome them:
1. The Listening Illusion: Why We Think We Hear Each Other (But Donât) đâ
Many of us pride ourselves on being good listeners. But Duhiggâs research suggests that most of the time, weâre not truly listeningâweâre just waiting for our turn to speak. In a fast-paced work environment, this can lead to misunderstandings, shallow discussions, and missed opportunities.
What to do instead: Try looping for understanding (repeating back what you think you heard) before responding. This small shift ensures clarity and signals genuine engagement.
2. âConversational Charadesâ: The Assumption Trap đ
Ever had a conversation where you walked away thinking, That went well, only to find out later that the other person had a completely different takeaway? Thatâs because we often assume weâre having the same kind of conversationâpractical, emotional, or relationalâwhen in reality, weâre playing by different rules.
What to do instead: Before diving into solutions, clarify what type of conversation is needed. Is this about facts and decisions? đ§ Understanding emotions? â€ïž Strengthening a relationship? đ€ Getting aligned from the start prevents frustrating miscommunications.
3. The âZone of Productive Discomfortâ: Why Tension Can Be a Good Thing
Most people see tension in a conversation as a bad signâsomething to be avoided or smoothed over. But high-performing teams donât fear discomfort; they use it. True collaboration happens when people feel just uncomfortable enough to challenge ideas while still feeling psychologically safe to speak up. This includes acknowledging and navigating emotions rather than suppressing them.
What to do instead: Leaders can set the tone by welcoming dissent and modeling emotional awareness. đ Rather than shutting down disagreement, reframe it as a way to deepen trust and sharpen decision-making. đ ïž
Moving from Awareness to Action
By the afternoon, the large group of 55 was actively exchanging insights, tackling collaboration challenges, and experimenting with new ways to work across functions. It was a powerful reminder that effective collaboration isnât about avoiding friction, itâs about learning to work with it. đ„
What have been your biggest collaboration challenges? Have you ever experienced a case of Conversational Charades or fallen into the Listening Illusion?
Iâd love to hear your thoughts! Reach out to schedule a free consultation with me Karla Schlaepfer: info@designchange.de